





Balance is really the main word that comes to mind when I think of the parenting quality I strive for most. Each day I meet moms and dads from other generations and I think all of us make a lot of assumptions about each other. The assumption that bothers me the most however, is what I call 'guilt by association' parenting. Meaning, if you cloth diaper, you must be a hippy (a culture that annoys me). The same goes with extended breastfeeding or co-sleeping. Another example: if you choose to come up with alternatives to saying “no” all day long to your toddler, you must be a permissive parent with no backbone. Or, if you choose to provide wholesome meals for your child instead of the over-processed, environmentally taxing "kid-food" that's advertised, you're somehow depriving your child of their right to just "be kids". I could not disagree more.
Balance means my son sleeps in his crib but if he is having a hard time because he is sick or teething, he can sleep in bed with me. It means I no longer nurse on demand but because my son is allergic to cow's milk, he can continue to nurse a couple times a day as well as have soy milk. It means sometimes I don't want to throw money away so he can wear the cloth diapers I purchased when he was a newborn, and when I don't feel like washing them anymore he can wear disposables.
Balance also means that we will provide 3 well rounded, sugar-free, whole grain, organic meals a day. But outside of meal times we can have treats too--like going out for ice cream on Saturday afternoons, or eating cookies when friends come over, or there’s a party, holiday, or someone’s made a special treat, or we’re visiting friends or family who do not eat that way etc. It’s all about development (I have a 17 month old not a 5 year old) context (why are we eating this) and whether or not basic nutrition has first been met (is lunch finished before we have that cookie)---or just basic common sense (if he’s drinking plain milk with no problem, why introduce chocolate syrup?). You have such a short window of opportunity to fully control your child’s diet, so why not take advantage and provide the healthiest options out there? They will have plenty of time for the fun stuff later and by then you won’t have much say in the matter anyway.
Since becoming a toddler, Henry has begun to test our new parent-legs. He doesn't want to share his toys and sometimes he throws them. Sometimes he wants to be held and other times he runs from us. Sometimes he eats everything in sight and other times food is as exciting as algebra. Sometimes Henry sleeps 12 hours a night and other times he sleeps 10. Sometimes he takes 2 naps and sometimes 1. It’s all a work in progress and he's not a robot or computer you can program. I try not to get frustrated when he varies from the norm, because he’s growing like crazy—physically and mentally, so things can’t possibly stay the same for very long. I also try not to put him in situations I know he can’t handle, like a nice restaurant, a movie, a football game or a library. Sure, he could do small doses of all those things, but to expect him to behave as long as it would take for an adult to enjoy any of these outings would be unfair. I chose to have him in my life, so I’ve made accommodations. Besides, this is all such a blip in time. I will have plenty of opportunities in the future to do all of the above again.
The same theme of balance also applies for setting limits. I will keep him from harm but not from exploration. I will immediately step in if he or someone else is about to get hurt but for the most part, I try to limit situations that would require me to intervene. I also try to follow through on all of my limits—meaning, I do not set a limit I can not enforce. For example, I saw a man yesterday at Central Market tell his young toddler to sit down (she was standing on a chair but holding on and her much older sibling was next to her) and he repeated himself several times to no avail. She was not going to budge, not even when her brother tried to force her to sit. So the dad and the brother gave up and she continued to stand on the chair. This is not a big deal but it’s an example of not being able to follow through on your limit. Personally, since the child was so young, I wouldn’t have bothered setting that limit since I knew the child was safe and the lesson would be lost on her.
So the options are:
I choose A and that’s not to say B and C are wrong, it’s just not my style with my son. It seems like there’s good reason why potty training a young toddler is not encouraged and that’s because they can’t sit still for very long. The same goes for being at a restaurant. Henry is capable of eating his meal fully, and then it’s time to go.
My other reason for picking my battles stems from my experience counseling families with older children. A common trait with families experiencing a lot of problems was parents who could not follow through on consequences (saying their kid is grounded but giving in to the child eventually)—or having chores but not enforcing them etc. I can’t speak for the future because I’ve already gone back on several things I swore I’d never do as a parent (like letting Henry cry it out), but I am always aware of not setting a limit I can’t or am unwilling to enforce, or setting too many limits so that I turn into Charlie Brown’s teacher blah blah blahing all day long.
Anyway, it’s not an all or nothing, always or never thing—this parenting stuff. I try to be flexible and developmentally appropriate. I remind myself that a 1 and a half year old is developmentally different from even a two year old and that my behavioral expectations must be reasonable. Sure, I’d like him not to whine in his car seat, but is he tired, is he hungry, has he been in there more than ten or fifteen minutes---and if the answer is yes to any of that, then it’s my fault he’s upset, not his.
My final point regarding parenting styles is that I think a lot of parenting techniques that were employed in the past were born more out of survival (parent centered) then from a developmental standpoint (child centered). Historically dads didn’t do much around the house or with the children. Moms were on their own and not only did they have to care for the house and the children, they had a lot more to do back then and they had less to do it with (thank you modern conveniences). They did not have cell phones and the internet to keep them connected with the adult world and they did not (generally) have the option to go back to their fabulous career if they wanted to. I honestly don’t think I could have hacked it back then. If Justin didn’t come home everyday at lunch and for good at 4:10—play with Henry, cook dinner and help put him to bed, I too would be a lot stricter and a lot less patient. You’d have to be. Henry would not have been held as much, slept with as much, played with as much etc. etc. There’s no way I could maintain that level of full-time care without Justin’s support and without the escapism of the internet when Henry naps. So for that reason I understand where the previous generation is coming from—I don’t envy the difficult times they parented though and I understand why they used playpens, feeding schedules and spanking, but people’s lives have changed dramatically in the last 20 years and so parenting techniques have adapted.
Thanks for stopping by. Come back again.
Balance is really the main word that comes to mind when I think of the parenting quality I strive for most. Each day I meet moms and dads from other generations and I think all of us make a lot of assumptions about each other. The assumption that bothers me the most however, is what I call 'guilt by association' parenting. Meaning, if you cloth diaper, you must be a hippy (a culture that annoys me). The same goes with extended breastfeeding or co-sleeping. Another example: if you choose to come up with alternatives to saying “no” all day long to your toddler, you must be a permissive parent with no backbone. Or, if you choose to provide wholesome meals for your child instead of the over-processed, environmentally taxing "kid-food" that's advertised, you're somehow depriving your child of their right to just "be kids". I could not disagree more.
Balance means my son sleeps in his crib but if he is having a hard time because he is sick or teething, he can sleep in bed with me. It means I no longer nurse on demand but because my son is allergic to cow's milk, he can continue to nurse a couple times a day as well as have soy milk. It means sometimes I don't want to throw money away so he can wear the cloth diapers I purchased when he was a newborn, and when I don't feel like washing them anymore he can wear disposables.
Balance also means that we will provide 3 well rounded, sugar-free, whole grain, organic meals a day. But outside of meal times we can have treats too--like going out for ice cream on Saturday afternoons, or eating cookies when friends come over, or there’s a party, holiday, or someone’s made a special treat, or we’re visiting friends or family who do not eat that way etc. It’s all about development (I have a 17 month old not a 5 year old) context (why are we eating this) and whether or not basic nutrition has first been met (is lunch finished before we have that cookie)---or just basic common sense (if he’s drinking plain milk with no problem, why introduce chocolate syrup?). You have such a short window of opportunity to fully control your child’s diet, so why not take advantage and provide the healthiest options out there? They will have plenty of time for the fun stuff later and by then you won’t have much say in the matter anyway.
Since becoming a toddler, Henry has begun to test our new parent-legs. He doesn't want to share his toys and sometimes he throws them. Sometimes he wants to be held and other times he runs from us. Sometimes he eats everything in sight and other times food is as exciting as algebra. Sometimes Henry sleeps 12 hours a night and other times he sleeps 10. Sometimes he takes 2 naps and sometimes 1. It’s all a work in progress and he's not a robot or computer you can program. I try not to get frustrated when he varies from the norm, because he’s growing like crazy—physically and mentally, so things can’t possibly stay the same for very long. I also try not to put him in situations I know he can’t handle, like a nice restaurant, a movie, a football game or a library. Sure, he could do small doses of all those things, but to expect him to behave as long as it would take for an adult to enjoy any of these outings would be unfair. I chose to have him in my life, so I’ve made accommodations. Besides, this is all such a blip in time. I will have plenty of opportunities in the future to do all of the above again.
The same theme of balance also applies for setting limits. I will keep him from harm but not from exploration. I will immediately step in if he or someone else is about to get hurt but for the most part, I try to limit situations that would require me to intervene. I also try to follow through on all of my limits—meaning, I do not set a limit I can not enforce. For example, I saw a man yesterday at Central Market tell his young toddler to sit down (she was standing on a chair but holding on and her much older sibling was next to her) and he repeated himself several times to no avail. She was not going to budge, not even when her brother tried to force her to sit. So the dad and the brother gave up and she continued to stand on the chair. This is not a big deal but it’s an example of not being able to follow through on your limit. Personally, since the child was so young, I wouldn’t have bothered setting that limit since I knew the child was safe and the lesson would be lost on her.
So the options are:
I choose A and that’s not to say B and C are wrong, it’s just not my style with my son. It seems like there’s good reason why potty training a young toddler is not encouraged and that’s because they can’t sit still for very long. The same goes for being at a restaurant. Henry is capable of eating his meal fully, and then it’s time to go.
My other reason for picking my battles stems from my experience counseling families with older children. A common trait with families experiencing a lot of problems was parents who could not follow through on consequences (saying their kid is grounded but giving in to the child eventually)—or having chores but not enforcing them etc. I can’t speak for the future because I’ve already gone back on several things I swore I’d never do as a parent (like letting Henry cry it out), but I am always aware of not setting a limit I can’t or am unwilling to enforce, or setting too many limits so that I turn into Charlie Brown’s teacher blah blah blahing all day long.
Anyway, it’s not an all or nothing, always or never thing—this parenting stuff. I try to be flexible and developmentally appropriate. I remind myself that a 1 and a half year old is developmentally different from even a two year old and that my behavioral expectations must be reasonable. Sure, I’d like him not to whine in his car seat, but is he tired, is he hungry, has he been in there more than ten or fifteen minutes---and if the answer is yes to any of that, then it’s my fault he’s upset, not his.
My final point regarding parenting styles is that I think a lot of parenting techniques that were employed in the past were born more out of survival (parent centered) then from a developmental standpoint (child centered). Historically dads didn’t do much around the house or with the children. Moms were on their own and not only did they have to care for the house and the children, they had a lot more to do back then and they had less to do it with (thank you modern conveniences). They did not have cell phones and the internet to keep them connected with the adult world and they did not (generally) have the option to go back to their fabulous career if they wanted to. I honestly don’t think I could have hacked it back then. If Justin didn’t come home everyday at lunch and for good at 4:10—play with Henry, cook dinner and help put him to bed, I too would be a lot stricter and a lot less patient. You’d have to be. Henry would not have been held as much, slept with as much, played with as much etc. etc. There’s no way I could maintain that level of full-time care without Justin’s support and without the escapism of the internet when Henry naps. So for that reason I understand where the previous generation is coming from—I don’t envy the difficult times they parented though and I understand why they used playpens, feeding schedules and spanking, but people’s lives have changed dramatically in the last 20 years and so parenting techniques have adapted.
Thanks for stopping by. Come back again.